DISQUS

DISQUS Hello! ETC: Everyday Thoughts Collected is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

ETC: Everyday Thoughts Collected

Personal Blog of Randy Thomas
Jump to original thread »
Author

Economic Bail Out Blues

Started by Randy · 9 months ago

WARNING: A full on Cat 3 Randy Rant is about to make blog-fall in 5 …. 4 …. 3 …. 2 ….
The more I learn about the bail out the more I don’t trust Congress to be able to pull off something that is actually in the best interest of the peop ... Continue reading »

19 comments

  • Sigh. BIG SIGH. Just say no. No bail out at my expense, please. Especially when one party is trying to drag the other party on board, labeling it bi-partisanship, when in fact it's a big ol' case of CYA just in case the bail out doesn't work . . . so the party dragged on board can be blamed. I don't want to "buy-in" or bail out. I'm calling my elected officials today urging them to refuse to buy in.
  • Didn't make it out of the House. i hear feet scurrying and feel telephone lines and airwaves burning. Because I am a lower middle-class citizen, either way this situation resolves, it will hit my pocket. Hard. So be it. (Please remind me of this when I'm whining later!)
  • Ok... just remember we have to find our way back to the war against whining at some point. :)

    EVERYONE was talking about this today. Even my neighbor, Metallica Man, mentioned it the first thing out of his mouth as I walked toward my front door. His most frequent word in the exchange was the f* bomb.

    None to happy.
  • Apparently a LOT of people were calling today. This has got to be an unprecedented day on The Hill.
  • Economic Bail Out Blues http://tinyurl.com/4kj52n
  • Sigh. BIG SIGH. Just say no. No bail out at my expense, please. Especially when one party is trying to drag the other party on board, labeling it bi-partisanship, when in fact it's a big ol' case of CYA just in case the bail out doesn't work . . . so the party dragged on board can be blamed. I don't want to "buy-in" or bail out. I'm calling my elected officials today urging them to refuse to buy in.
  • I haven't been staying updated, does anyone know if the clause for 20% of recovered funds to go to ACORN stayed in the bill? That alone would be reason label it a partisan bill. They're basically a corrupt, liberal special interest group. That Obama used to be a lobbyist for.
  • Hey Matt, I have sent your question to one of my friends in DC. She is *awesome* and I will let you know when I hear back from her ( or maybe she might just post directly here :) )
  • I just heard from my friend C. in DC ... and here is her response to your question ...

    I believe that Barney Frank let the "cat out of the bag" today on the House floor (or it was during an interview?). I am trying to get the transcript. ...

    He said the funds for ACORN were taken out, BUT he tripped up and said something about some of the "other groups" were not affected. (Not affected?!?) Red flag to me. ESPECIALLY because Barney Frank and Rahm Emanuel negotiated much of the bill . (Ram is an IL Dem; former fund-raiser for the same Chicago "Daley machine" that trained Obama; ruthless, hard-core liberal; on the Ways & Means Comm (hands on the "pocketbook")). I have a gut feel that they did a "work around" to get the money BACK to ACORN.

    Will get it to you when I find it. Hugs, c :)
  • Thanks for the follow up Randy. I think it's embarrassing that the bill that was signed ended up being over 450 pages, when it started at 3.5. Congress and the lobbyists seeking opportunist earmarks during a time like this should be ashamed.
  • Seriously, and we are looking to this same crew to overhaul the health, banking industries and reform the tax system.
  • Didn't make it out of the House. i hear feet scurrying and feel telephone lines and airwaves burning. Because I am a lower middle-class citizen, either way this situation resolves, it will hit my pocket. Hard. So be it. (Please remind me of this when I'm whining later!)
  • I haven't been staying updated, does anyone know if the clause for 20% of recovered funds to go to ACORN stayed in the bill? That alone would be reason label it a partisan bill. They're basically a corrupt, liberal special interest group. That Obama used to be a lobbyist for.
  • Hey Matt, I have sent your question to one of my friends in DC. She is *awesome* and I will let you know when I hear back from her ( or maybe she might just post directly here :) )
  • Apparently a LOT of people were calling today. This has got to be an unprecedented day on The Hill.
  • Ok... just remember we have to find our way back to the war against whining at some point. :)


    EVERYONE was talking about this today. Even my neighbor, Metallica Man, mentioned it the first thing out of his mouth as I walked toward my front door. His most frequent word in the exchange was the f* bomb.



    None to happy.

  • I just heard from my friend C. in DC ... and here is her response to your question ...


    I believe that Barney Frank let the "cat out of the bag" today on the House floor (or it was during an interview?). I am trying to get the transcript. ...




    He said the funds for ACORN were taken out, BUT he tripped up and said something about some of the "other groups" were not affected. (Not affected?!?) Red flag to me. ESPECIALLY because Barney Frank and Rahm Emanuel negotiated much of the bill . (Ram is an IL Dem; former fund-raiser for the same Chicago "Daley machine" that trained Obama; ruthless, hard-core liberal; on the Ways & Means Comm (hands on the "pocketbook")). I have a gut feel that they did a "work around" to get the money BACK to ACORN.



    Will get it to you when I find it. Hugs, c :)

  • Thanks for the follow up Randy. I think it's embarrassing that the bill that was signed ended up being over 450 pages, when it started at 3.5. Congress and the lobbyists seeking opportunist earmarks during a time like this should be ashamed.
  • Seriously, and we are looking to this same crew to overhaul the health, banking industries and reform the tax system.

Add New Comment

Returning? Login