DISQUS

ETC: Everyday Thoughts Collected: Hannity’s America to Uncover Obama’s “Radical” Past - Is This Appropriate?

  • bopst · 1 year ago
    This is the stuff of grand tragic comedy. How people actually believe this nonsense is beyond me. Swift boating has no basis in fact...
  • Frank Carrasco · 1 year ago
    Bad company corrupts good character. The man can give a speech for sure... but his relations are shady at best. when obama sits in a church for years with a man that preaches black supremacy from the pulpit... I can only assume an Obama administration will further increase the race divide in america. what does it mean for obama to launch his career in the livingroom of a known terrorist? does he hold the "any means necessary" ideology of terrorists? does he see "one death as a tragedy but a million deaths as a statistic?" keep in mind that hes been in the senate for two years and now he might be president. there is alot we still dont know about him... alot of skeletons. there is a saying in spanish that goes: better the enemy you know than the ally you dont... we dont know obama.
  • Randy · 1 year ago
    I like that Spanish saying Frank. It's very true.
  • Janey · 1 year ago
    I agree with you Randy, let the facts speak for themselves and I'd for sure like to see Obama explain his association with these people. It is interesting to find that Palins character has been scrutinized more then any other person running in this election. And I would say that it's not so much about the person's past but more so how they've been able to work through their past and change what was needed to change. I don't know about you but if Obama's associations can actually be proven I'd like to see if these associations are still tied together. And perhaps most people running in a Presidential election wouldn't get so far if there were Terroists associated with the person.
  • Randy · 1 year ago
    I can agree with someone who has had questionable associations who doesn't disown them but is candid and learned from them ... and moved on.
  • Michael · 1 year ago
    Obama and McCain both have ties to evil people that make them unsupportable by Christians, in my opinion.

    Obama was a little child, too, when Ayers was a bomber -- Ayers has been a university professor for years, but that doesn't excuse those who worked with him after his bombing days were over.

    Meanwhile, during the 1980s, Sen. John McCain served on the board of a group, the "Council of World Freedom," that was affiliated with the supremacist World Anti-Communist League. McCain's group supplied arms and funds to paramilitary mercenary organizations in Latin America that were kidnapping, torturing, and killing civilians -- all for some greater good, I'm sure, just like Ayers.

    So I'm afraid that neither Obama nor McCain are moral leaders. And as we saw with their votes on the Wall Street bailout, both will throw away their morals when lobbyists come calling. Both voted for $100 billion in pork, and both voted to tax Americans to keep Wall Street bankers secure.
  • BK · 1 year ago
    To be Commander & Chief , Nobama has no experiance except in bad judgement with whom he has associated with and I wonder why these associates have been so interested in him. Nobama is not "Pro Life" and I haven't read anything in the Bible to support his agenda in Any of his campaign issues although they change whenever polls change. This guy sure gets alot of money contributed to him and it can't be from the wealthy in this country because he wants to "spread the wealth around" ! Oh yea, he gets it from "Joe Text" and "John Doe's" Hummmmmmmmmm
  • bopst · 1 year ago
    This is the stuff of grand tragic comedy. How people actually believe this nonsense is beyond me. Swift boating has no basis in fact...
  • Janey · 1 year ago
    I agree with you Randy, let the facts speak for themselves and I'd for sure like to see Obama explain his association with these people. It is interesting to find that Palins character has been scrutinized more then any other person running in this election. And I would say that it's not so much about the person's past but more so how they've been able to work through their past and change what was needed to change. I don't know about you but if Obama's associations can actually be proven I'd like to see if these associations are still tied together. And perhaps most people running in a Presidential election wouldn't get so far if there were Terroists associated with the person.
  • Frank Carrasco · 1 year ago
    Bad company corrupts good character. The man can give a speech for sure... but his relations are shady at best. when obama sits in a church for years with a man that preaches black supremacy from the pulpit... I can only assume an Obama administration will further increase the race divide in america. what does it mean for obama to launch his career in the livingroom of a known terrorist? does he hold the "any means necessary" ideology of terrorists? does he see "one death as a tragedy but a million deaths as a statistic?" keep in mind that hes been in the senate for two years and now he might be president. there is alot we still dont know about him... alot of skeletons. there is a saying in spanish that goes: better the enemy you know than the ally you dont... we dont know obama.
  • Michael · 1 year ago
    Obama and McCain both have ties to evil people that make them unsupportable by Christians, in my opinion.


    Obama was a little child, too, when Ayers was a bomber -- Ayers has been a university professor for years, but that doesn't excuse those who worked with him after his bombing days were over.



    Meanwhile, during the 1980s, Sen. John McCain served on the board of a group, the "Council of World Freedom," that was affiliated with the supremacist World Anti-Communist League. McCain's group supplied arms and funds to paramilitary mercenary organizations in Latin America that were kidnapping, torturing, and killing civilians -- all for some greater good, I'm sure, just like Ayers.



    So I'm afraid that neither Obama nor McCain are moral leaders. And as we saw with their votes on the Wall Street bailout, both will throw away their morals when lobbyists come calling. Both voted for $100 billion in pork, and both voted to tax Americans to keep Wall Street bankers secure.

  • Randy · 1 year ago
    I like that Spanish saying Frank. It's very true.
  • Randy · 1 year ago
    I can agree with someone who has had questionable associations who doesn't disown them but is candid and learned from them ... and moved on.
  • BK · 1 year ago
    To be Commander & Chief , Nobama has no experiance except in bad judgement with whom he has associated with and I wonder why these associates have been so interested in him. Nobama is not "Pro Life" and I haven't read anything in the Bible to support his agenda in Any of his campaign issues although they change whenever polls change. This guy sure gets alot of money contributed to him and it can't be from the wealthy in this country because he wants to "spread the wealth around" ! Oh yea, he gets it from "Joe Text" and "John Doe's" Hummmmmmmmmm
  • Tyler · 1 year ago
    Wait a minute . . .You guys do know that god is just a concept . . .right?
  • Randy · 1 year ago
    Nice try Tyler ...
  • Tyler · 1 year ago
    Wait a minute . . .You guys do know that god is just a concept . . .right?
  • Randy · 1 year ago
    Nice try Tyler ...