-
Website
http://randythomas.org/ -
Original page
http://randythomas.org/2008/11/17/no-more-mr-nice-gay-is-this-what-we-want/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Jonathan
139 comments · 3 points
-
donbeeson
12 comments · 3 points
-
mdturner77
18 comments · 1 points
-
Matt_V
17 comments · 1 points
-
editorgal
65 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Thanks for the update, Randy.
I would love to have a link to that particular blog post. I can add it to the original post.
Took a while to find it.
To Joe's comments: I would tend to agree. The first couple of times I went out with this group, the Lord granted amazing favor to us. We had lots of opportunities to simply talk to people and pray. In the context of everything that has happened since the election, the words "wise as serpents innocent as doves" come to mind. The outreach has been happening for at least 3 and maybe 4 years now - I know the people who started it, and in their defense its not like they showed up Friday for the first time (in fact, I'm not sure the people who were there this past Friday are even directly connected to the people who originally started the outreach). Still, maybe not the best judgment, but the reaction is definitely scary.
Also, there are reply links under each comment if you wanted to reply directly to Joe's.
It's good to see you.
That said, when freedom of speech gets trampled on, that's worth fighting. The public should be aware of anyone's abuse of anyone else's free speech, so I think it's important this video gets exposure. (Though I hope whoever shows it is honest enough to remind viewers that a mob of angry young Castro gays isn't a good representation of the entire homosexual population.)
But hey, the comments from gay readers on the "No More Mr. Nice Gay" blog you linked above pretty much applaud these gay "strong arm" tactics. That's more distrubing to me than the video itself.
But, it seems that this type of behavior is gaining acceptance within the gay community and I pray that isn't a trend and am hoping that exposing when people approach or cross the line will reinforce the need for protecting that freedom.
As for the gay blog I linked too... you should have seen the comments on the one I decided to pass by. ::: whew :::
My wife and I love San Francisco. We grew up near there and for awhile lived in a Christian commune in Haight-Ashbury (back in the day). But so much as changed since then.
I still pray for the city when it comes to mind. What a mission field!
And ... uh ... a Christan commune? What exactly is that?
Most of the people had come to the Lord through the ministry. Some had been drug users....and one had been a male hustler.
I may blog about it someday.
I love watching and learning about group behavior. The odd thing is I don't like most reality tv because it isn't really real. So *real* real life stories intrigue me.
Thanks for the update, Randy.
I am trying to think if that relates to the whole "bear" thing going on in the gay community. That whole thing just perplexes me.
Matt's whole concept is really interesting.
However, I can't say I agree with Matt's concept. I don't think there is necessarily any oppressed or repressed masculinity among gay men (anymore than there is among straight men). Simply having "femme" traits doesn't make one non-masculine (I know a few straight men who are extremely effeminate, just in their mannerisms; it's just who they are). Our definitions of "masculinity" and "femininity" more-or-less come from culture, anyway.
Perhaps it's not that there has been repressed masculinity among gay men that is now surfacing. Maybe it's just that people always assumed that gay men weren't strong to start with, so now they're surprised to see this kind of anger (legitimate or not) coming from that community.
BUT, it would be along the lines of how long has this sub-culture existed (I don't remember any "bears" back in my day, doesn't mean there weren't any... I just never met any). What is the pros and cons of identifying in such a manner? Is the gay community really diverse in solidifying these subgroups or actually isolating people into these subgroups.
it would definitely be only about identity and sociology type questions. Plus, my style would probably let the conversation carry itself. Kind of like what I did with Matt Sanchez.
I would love to have a link to that particular blog post. I can add it to the original post.
That said, when freedom of speech gets trampled on, that's worth fighting. The public should be aware of anyone's abuse of anyone else's free speech, so I think it's important this video gets exposure. (Though I hope whoever shows it is honest enough to remind viewers that a mob of angry young Castro gays isn't a good representation of the entire homosexual population.)
But hey, the comments from gay readers on the "No More Mr. Nice Gay" blog you linked above pretty much applaud these gay "strong arm" tactics. That's more distrubing to me than the video itself.
Took a while to find it.
To Joe's comments: I would tend to agree. The first couple of times I went out with this group, the Lord granted amazing favor to us. We had lots of opportunities to simply talk to people and pray. In the context of everything that has happened since the election, the words "wise as serpents innocent as doves" come to mind. The outreach has been happening for at least 3 and maybe 4 years now - I know the people who started it, and in their defense its not like they showed up Friday for the first time (in fact, I'm not sure the people who were there this past Friday are even directly connected to the people who originally started the outreach). Still, maybe not the best judgment, but the reaction is definitely scary.
My wife and I love San Francisco. We grew up near there and for awhile lived in a Christian commune in Haight-Ashbury (back in the day). But so much as changed since then.
I still pray for the city when it comes to mind. What a mission field!
Also, there are reply links under each comment if you wanted to reply directly to Joe's.
It's good to see you.
But, it seems that this type of behavior is gaining acceptance within the gay community and I pray that isn't a trend and am hoping that exposing when people approach or cross the line will reinforce the need for protecting that freedom.
As for the gay blog I linked too... you should have seen the comments on the one I decided to pass by. ::: whew :::
And ... uh ... a Christan commune? What exactly is that?
I am trying to think if that relates to the whole "bear" thing going on in the gay community. That whole thing just perplexes me.
Matt's whole concept is really interesting.
Uh -- bears? Both Renee and Jeremy often call me "The Bear." Should I be worried? Don't answer.
Joe, don't worry about that nickname from your family ... from other people though ... be skeptical.
What wasn't seen in the video is that a young woman was pushed to the ground and then kicked by several people. While fortunately no serious injury occurred, the event definitely involved physical violence. The police came and advised the group to get in their van to be escorted to safety.
A little background on the group - it was born out of a vision and passion by a member of my old church in SF who once identified as gay and was heavily involved in the Castro "scene." He was joined by my friend who has an openly gay brother living in San Francisco, along with several other members of the church. The main focus of the Friday night outreaches was proclaiming the love of Jesus and praying with people. Anytime you mix Castro and Christian controversy is bound to show up. Some nights were peaceful, other times it caused a stir. (On one of my nights out a drunk man standing next to me called 911 to report that "The Christians are persecuting me." Seriously.)
Maybe about a year or so ago the original members of the group started to fade out, and the SFJHOP people became more involved. I've always felt a bit uncomfortable with this for some reason. In my mind it seems important that if you're going to do something like this, it needs to involve people who are directly tied to the community you are trying to reach.
But you are right Joe - a whole lot of prayer has gone into this ministry, and I can't speak for the SFJHOP folks but I know the people who originally started this outreach felt specifically called to the Castro by the Lord and were bold in ways that I really respect. (The first time I attempted to go out with my friends I got physically sick to my stomach, turned around and went home! It was right before I moved away from SF)
Hmmm... Interview? hmmm...
But, I would imagine you might blog about this more. If you do I will link to it. Thanks for chiming in. Very good.
Uh -- bears? Both Renee and Jeremy often call me "The Bear." Should I be worried? Don't answer.
Most of the people had come to the Lord through the ministry. Some had been drug users....and one had been a male hustler.
I may blog about it someday.
BUT, it would be along the lines of how long has this sub-culture existed (I don't remember any "bears" back in my day, doesn't mean there weren't any... I just never met any). What is the pros and cons of identifying in such a manner? Is the gay community really diverse in solidifying these subgroups or actually isolating people into these subgroups.
it would definitely be only about identity and sociology type questions. Plus, my style would probably let the conversation carry itself. Kind of like what I did with Matt Sanchez.
I love watching and learning about group behavior. The odd thing is I don't like most reality tv because it isn't really real. So *real* real life stories intrigue me.
Joe, don't worry about that nickname from your family ... from other people though ... be skeptical.
What wasn't seen in the video is that a young woman was pushed to the ground and then kicked by several people. While fortunately no serious injury occurred, the event definitely involved physical violence. The police came and advised the group to get in their van to be escorted to safety.
A little background on the group - it was born out of a vision and passion by a member of my old church in SF who once identified as gay and was heavily involved in the Castro "scene." He was joined by my friend who has an openly gay brother living in San Francisco, along with several other members of the church. The main focus of the Friday night outreaches was proclaiming the love of Jesus and praying with people. Anytime you mix Castro and Christian controversy is bound to show up. Some nights were peaceful, other times it caused a stir. (On one of my nights out a drunk man standing next to me called 911 to report that "The Christians are persecuting me." Seriously.)
Maybe about a year or so ago the original members of the group started to fade out, and the SFJHOP people became more involved. I've always felt a bit uncomfortable with this for some reason. In my mind it seems important that if you're going to do something like this, it needs to involve people who are directly tied to the community you are trying to reach.
But you are right Joe - a whole lot of prayer has gone into this ministry, and I can't speak for the SFJHOP folks but I know the people who originally started this outreach felt specifically called to the Castro by the Lord and were bold in ways that I really respect. (The first time I attempted to go out with my friends I got physically sick to my stomach, turned around and went home! It was right before I moved away from SF)
Hmmm... Interview? hmmm...
But, I would imagine you might blog about this more. If you do I will link to it. Thanks for chiming in. Very good.